Solicitation for Electrical Power Cables; DLA Land and Maritime

DLA Land and Maritime is looking for electrical power cables for vehicular use.  The cable assembly includes a twelve foot cable p/n 19207-11682336-4 and two adapters p/n 19207-11677570.  A drawing with id 11682379-4 is available at TACOM Warren.  Previous sales of this item were from Supplycore, Inc. in Rockford, IL for a unit price of $268 in small quantities.

The solicitation is for five option years with the following quantity ranges:

  • 1-183
  • 184-366
  • 367-732
  • 733-1,098

Contract Minimum value: $1,961.76

Contract Maximum value: $1,471,320

Proposals for this RFP should be e-mailed to DIBBS by July 20, 2020.  To learn more, log into BidLink and put SPE7L7-20-R-0011 in the “search for anything” box at the top of the screen.

See contract details on BidLink
See contract details on BidLink

Joint Base Andrews looking for flight attendant uniforms

The 11th Contracting Squadron (11 CONS) proposes to establish a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for Flight Attendant Uniforms .  This is different from a solicitation, whereas a BPA is an agreement where the military can order using a government credit card from a supplier at pre-established pricing.  There is no set quantity nor termination date, but DOD provides an estimate of how many units they need each year.

Item

Estimated Annual Qty

Men’s Blazer 60
Men’s Pants 120
Men’s Vest 60
Men’s Sweater 30
Men’s Shirt 180
Men’s Tie 180
Men’s/Women’s Apron 30
Women’s Blazer 60
Women’s Pant 120
Women’s Vest 60
Women’s Sweater 30
Women’s Shirt 180
Women’s Dress 120
Women’s Skirt 180

Offers must be returned by June 24, 2020 at 3:00PM EST.

To learn more about this request, log into BidLink and put FA286020QM013 into the “Search for anything” box at the top of the screen.

See contract details on BidLink
See contract details on BidLink

Hill Air Force solicits control surface repair kits for C-5 Galaxy

C-5 Galaxy
C-5 Galaxy

Hill Air Force is requesting bids on 39 control surface repair kits with an estimated contract value of $229,000. The most recent order was in 2014, won by Thomas Instrument in Boerne, Tx at a price of $5,888 per unit.  The solicitation is a small-business set-aside.

Offers are due at DLA by June 23, 2020.

The parts kit, NSN 1560-01-561-0288  includes washers, lock nuts, assembly thrust bearings, shafts, and number 4 cork. Suppliers must be qualified by DLA.  Technical data is available.

To learn more about this solicitation, log into BidLink and enter SPE4A7-20-T-222S into “Search for anything” at the top of the screen.

See contract details on BidLink
See contract details on BidLink

DLA solicits up to $1.8M of Diesel Engine Parts kits

DLA Land and Maritime is requesting proposals for supply of two diesel engine parts kits.  These kits are to maintain the 30KWB 805B / 806B and 815B /816B diesel generators.

The solicitation includes two national stock numbers with a maximum contract value of $1.8 Million.  DLA projects annual demand quantity as follows:

2815-01-532-9542 – Diesel Engine Kit – 231 units
2815-01-532-9543 – Diesel Engine Kit – 188 units
30KWB Diesel Generator
30KWB Diesel Generator

Offerers  for this five year contract must submit proposals to DLA by July 10, 2020.

To see the details on this solicitation, log into BidLink and put SPE7LX-20-R-0143 in the “Search for anything” box atop the screen.

See contract details on BidLink
Try BidLink for free 7 days – No credit card required.

DLA Aviation solicits KC-135 Structural Panels

The Defense Logistics Agency is seeking 5 to 20 structural panels for the KC-135 aircraft.  The request for proposal was issued on June 10 with responses due on July 10.

This solicitation is designated 100% small business set-aside.

The awardee will receive a five year Indefinite Quantity Contract (IDC).  DLA estimates they will need 20 units per year, but are only obligated to purchase a minimum of 5 units.  Intended sources include:

  • Nordham Group (cage 29957)
  • Handy Tool & Mfg (91750)
  • Honeycomb Co of America (99115)
  • Craft Mfg (0CMM5)

Other small businesses are welcome to submit proposals, although source approval is required. You can learn more about these companies including other items they have sold by logging into BidLink.

Technical data is available on the Boeing designed aluminum panel.

To see detail on this solicitation, log into BidLink and put SPE4A720R0759 into “Search for Anything” at the top of the screen.

Try BidLink for FREE 7 days.

 

Warner Robins Air Force solicits $200,00 worth of gun parts kits

A solicitation was issued on June 4 for 29 parts kits for guns to be delivered to Warner Robins Air Force Base. Recent procurement history indicates a price of $6,822 per kit for a total contract value of $197,838.

The kit includes:

  • Self-locking nuts
  • Machine screws
  • Shear bolts
  • Shims
  • Spring pins
  • Machine screws
  • Retaining rings
  • Lock washers
  • Entrance unit
  • drum unit

Price quotes are due by June 15.  For a complete parts list including National Stock Numbers and quoting details, go to BidLink.net

Win More Contracts with BidLink
Win More Contracts with BidLink

Government trade shows could be better

Defense Industry Trade Show
Defense Industry Trade Show

Government sponsored trade shows are B2G events that bring together buyers and sellers.  On the surface, it sounds like a great idea to increase competition for Government business. However, many companies are finding that the leads generated from these shows do not turn into business.

B2G shows are often packed with buyers, who process requisitions from managers and end users.  Their job is to solicit items and services, ensure competition where possible, and make sure the procurement adheres to the FAR.  Buyers can invite new companies into a procurement, but they do not decide what products and services are needed by the Government.

SPY PHONE BOX

At a recent trade show, the booth next to us at BidLink was a company selling a secret spy-phone signal blocking box, for top secret conference rooms.  It was basically a cone-of-silence for cell phones, with radio signal blocking, sound deadening and speakers that generate white noise.  Secret agents could put their phones in the box, close it, and have private conversation without the prying ears of spies. People in secret meetings can honestly say, “Honey, the phone never rang. I swear”.  It was a great idea, that will never gain traction at the typical B2G show.  This is because buyers, the most common attendees at B2G shows are not the folks who would make a decision that the Government needs a few secret spy-phone blocking boxes.  Program managers and other higher-ups have this authority, but it’s simply not the buyer’s job to decide what the Government needs.

A few booths down, there was a company selling industrial supplies. He had a catalog of over 10,000 items; everything from generators, to wash buckets, to paint, to industrial toilet paper.  B2G Shows are perfect for this type of company.  Drive around any military base and you will see hosing units, stores offices, and lots of people.  These people need every day things, and the Government buys lots of them.  A vendor selling commonly purchased items could forge a new relationship with many buyers at a B2G show.  Especially if they are 8a or small business.  Buyers love to bolster their set asides.

BETTER NETWORKING

We see lots of companies selling IT solutions at these shows.  They sell innovative solutions to Government problems, including staffing, supply chain, and even BidLink, who provides a tool for sourcing, pricing, and finding out almost anything about an NSN.  These services do not have a clearly defined market in the Military, but they provide efficiency that could save the Government money and time.

If you are trying to introduce something new to the Government, you may find it difficult to get any traction from a Government trade show.  This is because most of the attendees at these shows are either buyers, who only buy items that are requisitioned, or end users with no buying authority. We have met with very few program managers at these shows.  Program managers have the authority to decide if a new product or service could be of use to their group.

The idea of getting business and Government together make sense. Companies have difficulty reaching the right contacts in Government, so hosting meetups is a great idea. The disconnect is that sometimes these shows are filled with people who alone, cannot make the decision to buy your new product or service.

What might improve these trade shows would be for program managers as well as several of their personnel to attend the show together.  Often the program manager might not directly use the product or service, but has the authority to decide if it should be purchased. Program managers roaming a trade show with a couple of end users, who can evaluate the service would provide a powerful combination.  Combining the need to buy (end user) with the purchasing authority (program manager) allows companies with new ideas for the Government to showcase their wares to folks who may actually buy what they offer.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide. This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details. This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry. BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid search and notification services, competition analysis as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

For the news and tools to compete in the defense industry, go to www.bidlink.net.

By Tom Gerbe,  Defense Industry Analyst.

Defense Department Promoting Real Competition

 

WC-130J Hercules aircraft weather reconnaissance loadmaster
WC-130J Hercules aircraft weather reconnaissance loadmaster.
DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Manuel J. Martinez, U.S. Air Force. (Released)

By Tom Gerbe – Defense Information Analyst – BidLink.net

Small businesses have an uphill battle when trying to compete with big companies for defense contracts. Government officials know that small business participation not only helps local economies, but increases competition therefore reducing costs for the military.  Undersecretary of Defense, Dr. Ashton Carter recently stated that, “Real competition is the single most powerful tool available to the department to drive productivity”.  A number of initiatives are in place to promote “Real Competition”.

Twelve memoranda have been issued over the last three years from the president on down, outlining rules and methods for increasing competition in defense contracting.  All of this is designed to deliver better value to the taxpayer and warfighter by improving the way the department does business.  At a time when all departments are cutting expenses to reduce the deficit, program managers throughout DOD have a real motivation to act on these initiatives.

PROMOTE REAL COMPETITION

The following are recommendations from Dr. Ashton Carter on how to promote competition:

  • Present a competitive strategy at each program milestone
  • Remove obstacles to competition
  • Allow a reasonable time to bid
  • Require non-certified cost and pricing data on single offers
  • Require open system architectures and set rules for acquisition of technical data
  • Increase dynamic small business role in defense marketplace

Government buyers have a responsibility to promote competition wherever possible.  If you know the rules, they can be convinced to un-bundle contracts, consider alternative suppliers and even set-aside contracts exclusively for small business.  The key is understanding the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and how they can be used to benefit your company.

BUNDLED CONTRACTS

In some cases, your company may produce a part which is often included in larger, long-term contracts. The Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997 defines contract bundling as “consolidating two or more procurement requirements for goods or services previously provided or performed under separate, smaller contracts into a solicitation of offers for a single contract that is unlikely to be suitable for award to a small business concern.”

The act requires that each federal agency, to the maximum extent practicable:

  1. structure contracting requirements to facilitate competition by and among small business concerns, taking all reasonable steps to eliminate obstacles to their participation; and
  2. avoid unnecessary and unjustified bundling of contract requirements that may preclude small business participation in procurements as prime contractors.

In some cases, requirements are bundled together for years even though buyers are supposed to re-evaluate the market on a periodic basis.  At the time of the initial requirement by the Government there may have been only one supplier for a part, while years later a number of small business may be able to compete.  As a potential bidder on a contract, it is your responsibility to advise the buyer that you would like to compete for this business.  If you are successful, buyers may un-bundle a long-term contract for many items and solicit them separately in order to promote more small business competition.  The Government is required to justify contract bundling and this justification can be challenged by a prospective bidder.

COMPETITION ADVOCATE

When all else fails, each program provides a competition advocate.  According to FAR 6.502 Competition advocates are responsible for  promoting the acquisition of commercial items, promoting full and open competition, challenging requirements that are not stated in terms of functions to be performed. They are also responsible for challenging barriers to the acquisition of commercial items and full and open competition such as unnecessarily restrictive statements of work, unnecessarily detailed specifications, and unnecessarily burdensome contract clauses.  A memorandum from the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense states a commitment to, “Reinvigorate and expand the role of the competition advocate and reinforce the importance of competition to everyone involved in the acquisition process”.

We encourage you to study the Federal Acquisition Regulations and learn your rights as a contractor.  Many initiatives have been put in place to help small contractors compete.   Understanding the rules is the first step toward bringing Government business to your business.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide. This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details. This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry. BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid search and notification services, competition analysis as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

For the news and tools to compete in the defense industry, go to www.bidlink.net.

 

Defense contracting getting more competitive

Air Force Capt. Bachelor - a KC-10 Extender aircraft pilot
Air Force Capt. Bachelor – a KC-10 Extender aircraft pilot

by Tom Gerbe – Defense Information Analyst – BidLink.net

With the fiscal cliff rapidly approaching, defense contractors will need to become more competitive as defense budgets shrink.  BidLink recently analyzed defense spending by competition from 2003-2012 and discovered that almost half of the contracts awarded from the Defense Department were not competed.

Defense Spending by competition FY 2003-2012

This pattern varied by industry with makers of large systems including aircraft dominating markets, while manufacturers of clothing, refrigeration equipment and replacement parts experience a more competitive environment.

Competitive initiatives taking hold

The Defense Department is committed to increasing competition by delivering more contracts to small businesses.

Percentage of competition for defense contracts by year 2003-2012
Percentage of competition for defense contracts by year 2003-2012