Beginner’s guide to defense contracting

The U.S. Military is a reliable source of revenue, purchasing almost a quarter Billion dollars of fasteners last year.

Readers asked us how to get started with defense contracting, how to search for bids and look for specifications.  Although working with the Defense Department may seem foreign at first, it is actually a very structured process that’s easy to understand.

Military Standard Drawing

The CAGE code

Companies that wish to sell directly to the Department of Defense (DOD) must register with the government.  As of February 2011, there are 600,119 active registrants  in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR).  This is the central database where you register your company to do business with the DOD.  This step is easy; simply go to www.ccr.gov and choose “Central Contractor Registration”.  Fill in your company details and in three to five days, you’re registered.  They will issue a CAGE code; a five character alphanumeric sequence that is used to identify your company to the DOD.

What’s nice about the U.S. Military is that they have a database for everything. There is a database of companies, a database of awarded contracts, solicitations, part numbers, military specifications and on and on.  When you combine these databases you can do some pretty powerful things.  Since the CCR database contains a list of all companies registered to sell to DOD, you can easily find all of your competition.  They are even broken down by industry using FSC or NAICS codes.  By combining the CCR database with procurement history, you could look at all of the contracts awarded to your competition and analyze pricing for previous bids.  This can be used to determine  a competitive price that undercuts your competition while maximizing profit.

Finding Bids

The Department of Defense issues open solicitations (Bids) for fasteners using some basic categories. Knowledge of how these categories are structured and classified can greatly increase your chances finding and winning the bids for items that you supply.

In this example we will examine the fastener industry.  The Federal Supply Class (FSC) and item name categories are accurate ways to search for bids.  Fasteners are categorized under 7 basic FSC’s, they are:

5305 – Screws
5306 – Bolts
5307 – Studs
5310 – Nuts and Washers
5315 – Nails, Machine Keys, and Pins
5320 – Rivets
5325 – Fastening Devices

Information such as the National Stock Number (NSN), part number, specification(s), preferred manufacturers, and item names are commonly listed in a solicitation. Searching for open solicitations using classifications such as the FSC or the item name (or combination of both) can greatly increase the accuracy of your search and decrease the amount of time you spend searching.

The National Stock Number is the official label for items the military repeatedly purchases. It is a 13-digit number consisting of basically a Federal Supply Class (FSC) (the first 4 digits), a country code (the next 2 digits) and a unique serial number (the remaining 7 digits). The important one to remember is the FSC.  For example if the NSN listed in the solicitation is 5305-00-071-2078 you know it is some type of screw because the first 4 digits are 5305.

When searching for bids, it is advantageous to have multiple types of searches.  For example, a Federal Supply Class search for 5305, plus an item name search for “Screw, Cap” would produce solid results.  You could also use the NSN lookup to search for competitor’s part numbers and add that to your search.

Item Names and Specifications

Each NSN has a title, officially known as the item name.  The item name is very specific word or group of words used to describe the NSN. The item name contains a basic name and possibly a modifier such as “Screw,Cap”, the basic name is “Screw” and the modifier is “Cap” describing the type of screw.

The NSN 5305-00-071-2078 is assigned the item name “screw,cap,hexagon head”. If you wanted to search for bids on hexagon head cap screws you could try the item name “screw,cap,hexagon head” and would get accurate results. If you searched on the word “cap screws” you would return little or no results as that’s not how the government classifies screws. If you tried simply the item name “screw,cap” you would see many results including both hexagon head, socket head, etc. When using the official government item name your results will be plentiful and accurate. By searching the government’s item name database you can find all item names pertaining to your products.

Every NSN will have at least one or more reference numbers associated to it.  These reference numbers can either be a manufacturers’ part number, military specification/standard, commercial specification/standard (such as ASME) or a combination of all. These reference numbers may be listed in either the solicitation or in the part number cross reference (MCRL / MCRD) of the military NSN database.

Part number Cross Reference
Part and specification cross reference

The above example is BidLink’s NSN lookup display for the NSN described above.  It shows a list of company part numbers registered with the Government, which relate to the NSN, as well as two specifications.  Control Flow and Bosch both have their own unique part/reference number.  Their manufacturers’ numbers are listed in the left column. The other two rows pertain to the ANSI and Military standards, so you can figure out if this is something you can supply.  The Defense Department is moving away from using Military standards by allowing commercial standards bodies to define and manage the standards.  If you wanted to make this part, you would start by acquiring the ANSI and Military standards to determine if this is something you can produce competitively.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

This article was written exclusively for Fastener Journal.  http://fastenerjournal.com/

Fatigue Technology receives delivery order for $367,680

F-15 Fighter Jet

Fatigue Technology International won a defense contract for $367,680 from the U.S. Defense Department.  The company will provide 32,000 panel fastener inserts at $11.49ea to the Air Force for use in the F-15 fighter jet.  The order, contract # SPM5AY-10-D-0102 was placed on December 2 and is to be delivered by June 20, 2011.   It was placed against a long term contract set to expire on August 23, 2012, with an option to extend from one to three years.

At the time of the original solicitation,  number SPM5AY10R0014, a complete data package for the associated items did not exist.  A market survey was conducted by the Government to several fastener dealers and manufacturers to source these items. Solicitations were also sent directly to Herndon Products, Wesco Aircraft and Fatigue Technology.  It was determined that Fatigue Technology was the only source of supply known to have the capability to provide the required items based on the survey and was awarded a long term contract  on August 24, 2010.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

Panel fastener, flush flange; NSN 5325-01-561-9824

Batteries are big business for defense contractors

DLA_battery_sales
Annual battery purchases by Defense Logistics Agency

Companies that manufacture batteries for the U.S. Defense Department are experiencing some good times.  In 2010, the Defense Logistics Agency purchased  $127.59 million worth of batteries, 14.4% more than in 2009.  Currently, the military purchases 7,208 different types of batteries from 226 companies.

At BidLink, we have been mining over 500 million records of defense industry data looking for trends of interest for defense contractors,  and are finding that there is money to be made supplying seemingly common items.  While attention is generally directed toward big ticket buys like aircraft and weapons systems, the Department of Defense (DOD) is spending quite a bit of money on replacement parts called spares. We draw attention to this because there is opportunity for U.S. companies, who might be struggling during the Great Recession.  With retail sales in decline, the DOD can provide some stability for vendors. This week, we focus on the battery industry.

With portable technology as the foundation of the modern military, batteries have become an essential, recurring need.  From AAA to D, fuel cells to rechargeable, the defense department runs on batteries.  We examined several supply classes (FSC) for this study:

FSC list for batteries
Federal Supply Classification list for batteries

TOP SUPPLIERS

The leader in battery sales by number of contracts is Exide Technologies with 2,468.  Exide technologies is a for profit corporation located in Milton, Georgia and manufactures batteries as well as motor vehicle supplies.  They have over 1,500 employees and  annual sales of approximately $2.4 Billion. They were followed closely by Enersys Energy Products with 1,924 contracts.

DLA contracts for batteries
Defense Logistics Agency purchases for batteries (Click to see larger image)

As for sales volume, Enersys Energy Products is the clear leader with almost $32 Million in annual battery sales to the Defense Department for 2010.  Their most popular item by far was a storage battery used on vehicles including COUGAR and MRAP, National Stock Number 6140-01-485-1472, of which they sold 1,830 to DOD at  $305 each.  Most of their sales were through long term contracts, where the defense department agrees to purchase a quantity over time.  Once won by competitive bid, these contracts can sometimes last for years. The defense department issues periodic delivery orders against the contract when they need more supplies.  Armed with the right information, prudent contractors can win these contracts for themselves.

Top 10 defense department suppliers for batteries
Defense Logistics Agency purchases batteries (click to see larger image)

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

Defense Department buys a quarter billion dollars worth of fasteners in 2009

The U.S. Defense Department has been steadily increasing its purchases of fasteners and hardware.  At BidLink, we have studied government buying activity for screws, bolts, studs, nuts, washers, nails & rivets over the past five years and found that hardware is a growth industry.  In 2009, the Defense Logistics Agency, the primary procurement arm of the Defense Department purchased $233 Million worth of fasteners.

Defense Logistics Agency purchases of fasteners (click to see large image)
Defense Logistics Agency purchases of fasteners (click to see large image)

Although all of the numbers are not in yet, we predict 2010 will be down slightly, closer to $200 million.  Even in the face of major cuts to defense spending, purchases for fasteners are still strong.   Recent austerity measures at the defense department are slashing major purchases of new systems. This creates a growing need to support existing equipment with replacement parts.  As we study various industries, we are seeing a familiar pattern.  U.S. companies that make common items like batteries, safety equipment, electric motors, and hardware can make a lot of money selling to the government.

Win More Contracts with BidLink
Win More Contracts with BidLink (story continues below)

An analysis of the competition in this industry reveals that Herndon Products has won the most contracts with almost 6,000 in 2009.   The company supplied 3,310 different types of items to the defense department in that year.  The most popular was a National Stock Number 5310-01-097-8010, NUT,PLAIN,ASSEMBLED with 49 delivery orders in 2009.  These purchases were made through a long-term contract (see delivery order) , where once they win the bid, the defense department requests regular orders against the contract.   The above delivery order  for $9,126.02 is #575 against the master contract.  These types of contracts can last many years, but when they expire, prudent contractors can win them.

Top 10 DOD suppliers of fasteners
Top 10 DOD suppliers of fasteners(click to see larger image)

By sales, the winner is Columbia Nut and Bolt, with almost $17 Million in 2009.  Their headquarters is in Moonachie, New Jersey.   They are a wholesaler of hardware 500-750 employees, which primarily sells to the government. They are followed closely by Herndon Products with nearly $16 Million.

Top 10 fastener sales 2009
Top 10 suppliers of fasteners by sales (click to see larger image)

The Defense Logistics Agency buys over 185,000 different kinds of fasteners, screws, nuts, bolts and rivets.  The total number of contracts in 2009 jumped 15% over the 2008 tally to 51,150.

BidLink.net is an aggregator of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup services to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

(Exculsive article to the American Fastener Journal)

Defense department demand stable for electric motors

Honda Clarity Electric Motor

Pentagon demand for electric motors has been stable over the last five years, with Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) annual purchasing at around $26 Million.  Many industries studied by BidLink have shown the same pattern of a significant increase in sales from 2006-2007, then stabilization.  In September 2010, defense secretary Robert Gates called for $100 Billion in cuts to the Defense Department budget over the next five years.  Fortunately for companies that make replacement parts, this means more business as many of these cuts could affect large projects like the F35 aircraft, while not affecting the process of repairing and restocking, and technologically upgrading the military.   The Defense department has expressed their commitment to cut waste without reducing capabilities.

DLA Motor Purchases - Source bidlink.net
DLA Motor Purchases - Source bidlink.net

We examined the competition in this industry for FY 2009, since at the time of this article, 2010 had not yet ended.  Honeywell International (CAGE code 70210) is the clear leader by number of contracts, winning 450% more than the second place holder, Arc Systems (67245).

Win More Contracts with BidLink
Win More Contracts with BidLink (story continues below)

This follows a similar pattern that we have seen in other industries analyzed by BidLink.  It seems that each industry has a clear leader, winning significantly more contracts than the other competitors.  Much of this business comes from long term contracts, which are periodically re-awarded.   Opportunity exists for savvy competitors.

Top 10 DLA electric motor suppliers
Top 10 electric motor suppliers to Defense Department DLA - Source Bidlink.net

By sales volume, Honeywell (70210) almost tripled the sales of GE Avation Systems (81039) in 2009. The other eight competitors were almost evenly matched.  The largest contract for 2009 was 296 AC Control Motors, NSN: 6105-00-938-8503 at $6.102.17 each for a total contract value of $1,806,242.32 (see contract).

Top 10 electric motor suppliers to Defense Department DLA - Source Bidlink.net
Top 10 electric motor suppliers by sales to DLA - Source Bidlink.net

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

BidLink is about to get better

It’s  been a while since we published an update of new features.  We have been working quietly on a few upgrades that let you do more with BidLink..net.  In a few weeks, we will be releasing this new upgrade, but you can get a sneak preview by clicking here, or going to test.bidlink.net.

Don’t worry, we haven’t changed the site so much that you will not recognize it.  Most of the changes are improvements to existing features, and we’ve added a few new features too.

Information Center

BidLink Information Center
The BidLink Information Center (click to see larger image)

A new addition to BidLink is the information center.  This is your one-stop shopping for help, reference, videos and information.  It even has a vast resource of DOD documents and specifications, just a click away.  You can get to it almost anywhere on the site, by clicking on the icon wherever you see it, or clicking on areas with a highlighted background.   It’s also in the left navigation under Help and Information.  Feel free to explore it’s greatness.  There is a video describing the information center here.

New Bid Search

BidLink new bid search
The new bid search - click to see larger image

The bid search underwent a major overhaul.  The interface has been simplified, although it is even more powerful.  It provides easy access to “not” searches, which help you to refine your results by removing unwanted bids before you see them.  This can save quite a bit of time.  More help on the New Bid Search is here.

Quick Search

BidLink quick search
BidLink quick search - click to see larger image

We have added the quick search to more areas of the site, and fixed some bugs.  It can now search more databases, including Mil-Specs.  Unlike before, where BidLink would send a request to the Government for a mil-spec, we now serve them from our own network.  BidLink has almost 200,000 mil-spec documents, comprising much of the DOD’s library.  A video on the Quick Search is here.

Beyond features, there’s more data.  Lots more.  We now host a library of contract actions, which are procurement history that doesn’t fall under DOD’s NIIN based indexing system.  These may include GSA contracts, DD350 and more.  Look for contract actions when you search a company in the vendor lookup tool. We have also added more procurement history from hard to get sources like Navy and TACOM.

We’ve expanded our vendor data area with more information on companies and their activity.  NSN lookup has more part numbers, including replaced NSNs.  Forecast data offers the DOD’s predictions on future buying activity; ML-C tells you the unit price in case there is no procurement history.  NSN status has also been added.

We hope you enjoy the new BidLink.net, and value your comments.  The next few weeks will be polishing the new system .   If you find any bugs, or have suggestions, use the contact area in the information center to drop us a note.

-Tom Gerbe

BidLink Development Staff

Sharp rise in Defense Department purchases of Antenna

Defense Department - Antenna
Army Pfc. Paul Garland & Pfc. Sean McCall set up an antenna for voice and tactical communications. Photo by Chief Petty Officer Robert J. Fluegel.

The U.S. Defense Department purchased 22.2% more antennae in FY 2010 than in 2009.  The charts below analyze the  buying activity of the U.S. Defense Department’s Defense Logistics Agency for Antennas and Antenna equipment; Federal Supply Class 5985.  An analysis of  projected purchases for 2011 indicate demand similar to that of FY 2010.

Federal Supply Class 5985 includes Antennas, waveguides, and related equipment; Aerials; Masts; Tower Equipment; Attenuators; Couplers; Transmission Lines, but excludes Tower Structures.

Defense department antenna buying activity for 2006-2009
Defense department antenna buying activity for 2006-2010

At BidLink.net, we have over 500,000,000 records of defense contracting data, including an archive of purchasing activity dating back to 1985.   For this study, we analyzed 2010 buying activity for Antennae by both total number of contracts and total sales volume.

By contract volume, the leader is Harris RF Communication (CAGE 14304), with 314 total contracts in 2010.  Harris RF Communication is a division of  Harris Corporation located in Rochester, NY.  The company is a manufacturer with over 1,500 employees.  Their primary focus is radio and television broadcasting equipment, communications equipment and electronic components including antennas.  They are certified to manufacture over 16,500 parts for the U.S. Military.

2010 Top 10 Antenna suppliers to U.S. Defense Department
2010 Top 10 Antenna suppliers to U.S. Defense Department

By sales volume, Harris Corporation is the clear leader, with $9,666,106 in sales for 2010.  Aviatech corporation (CAGE code 54520) is in second place with less than half the sales of Harris at $4.2 million.  The largest antenna delivery order for Harris RF Communication in 2010 was SPM7M9-11-F-0001 awarded on October 7  for $512,000.  They produced a total quantity of 400 antennae, National Stock Number 5985-01-559-0074 at $1,280 each.  This is part of a larger GSA contract (GS-35F-0163N) which was awarded on December 9, 2002 and expires on December 8, 2012.  The GSA contract covers 555 different line items.

2010 Top 10 Antenna suppliers to DLA by sales

2010 Top 10 Antenna suppliers to DLA by sales

As with the other industries we have analyzed, many of these companies have long term contracts with the defense department.  This is where the defense department awards a contract to a single company, which may last for years.  The government issues periodic delivery orders against this contract award until it runs out.  This cuts down on the need to request quotes for every order, therefore reducing bureaucracy.  Prudent companies can monitor the expiration of these long term contracts, and with sufficient information they can submit competitive bids and possibly win the contract for themselves.

BidLink.net is an aggregator of defense industry information for contractors worldwide.  This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details.  This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry.  BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid consolidation, searching and notification services, as well as part number (NSN) lookup services to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

Top five defense contractors by sales volume

CH-47 Chinook Helicopter
Soldiers examine their CH-47 Chinook helicopter before mission

We examined buying activity from the Federal Procurement Data System, in order to obtain a list of the top five defense contractors.  After reviewing the federal budget, DLA buying activity, and many other sources, we found discrepancies in the data that encouraged us to perform a complete analysis of all purchases in the FPDS.  BidLink.net keeps up to date records of all FPDS transactions.  Below is a list of 21 agencies operating under the Department of Defense who have reported consolidated data on their contractors by dollar value for the fiscal year 2009.  The charts below show the top five contractors by dollar value for each agency.

2009 Top Contractors

Federal

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 21,174 $38,512,401,433.23
The Boeing Company 11,468 $21,956,065,368.89
Northrop Grumman Corporation 22,009 $19,654,882,647.82
General Dynamics Corporation 17,988 $16,432,366,120.40
Raytheon Company 10,480 $16,106,903,431.28

Department of Defense

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 17,762 $31,348,453,590.56
The Boeing Company 10,799 $20,604,690,106.84
Northrop Grumman Corporation 19,627 $18,293,375,394.47
General Dynamics Corporation 16,261 $15,662,063,160.18
Raytheon Company 9,697 $15,332,423,921.76

Department of the Navy

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 4,610 $12,420,762,609.78
Northrop Grumman Corporation 9,844 $8,668,835,819.63
General Dynamics Corporation 6,396 $8,005,594,096.52
Raytheon Company 2,656 $5,095,808,653.19
The Boeing Company 1,607 $4,993,553,179.45
Win More Contracts with BidLink
Win More Contracts with BidLink (story continues below)

Department of the Army

Company Total actions Total dollars
General Dynamics Corporation 4,268 $6,520,702,472.61
Raytheon Company 3,036 $6,386,829,395.31
Oshkosh Truck Corporation 613 $6,002,056,462.20
The Boeing Company 1,272 $5,199,869,571.68
KBR  Inc. 677 $4,637,091,616.01

Department of the Air Force

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 4,992 $12,721,684,392.24
The Boeing Company 3,094 $8,328,512,802.70
Northrop Grumman Corporation 4,381 $5,697,914,434.55
L-3 Communications Holdings  Inc. 2,415 $2,506,614,057.32
Raytheon Company 2,261 $2,364,176,372.56

Tricare Management Activity (TMA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Humana Inc. 257 $3,389,680,098.90
Health Net  Inc. 136 $2,818,236,858.39
Triwest Healthcare Alliance Corp. 128 $2,650,851,737.67
Anthem Health Of Indiana Inc. 1 $750,304,988.85
Sierra Military Health Services LLC 1 $527,348,655.04

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
SAIC Inc. 179 $131,231,178.89
Raytheon Company 78 $123,228,271.33
Northrop Grumman Corporation 61 $74,314,286.05
Bechtel Group Inc. 37 $70,181,269.80
Applied Research Associates Inc. 168 $48,317,931.00

Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. 423 $160,727,353.44
United Technologies Corporation 336 $127,187,015.51
Rolls-Royce Group PLC 139 $96,846,374.23
Northrop Grumman Corporation 574 $29,925,319.56
Raytheon Company 309 $19,705,598.28

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Northrop Grumman Corporation 107 $166,653,880.00
Raytheon Company 108 $128,127,696.00
BAE Systems PLC 38 $61,856,490.00
Lockheed Martin Corporation 41 $33,815,997.00
General Dynamics Corporation 26 $21,897,026.00

USTRANSCOM

Company Total actions Total dollars
FedEx Corporation 1,198 $1,506,090,850.42
Evergreen International Airlines Inc. 1,137 $1,322,675,791.37
United Parcel Service Inc. 464 $305,502,933.10
American Auto Logistics LP 18 $202,080,529.00
EP Investments LLC 50 $140,092,877.72

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 52 $160,110,727.00
SAIC Inc. 53 $63,866,621.03
Raytheon Company 33 $41,592,859.63
General Atomic Technologies Corporation 13 $39,645,859.00
Hopkins Johns University 59 $38,422,044.00

Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
SAIC Inc. 573 $383,239,379.39
Northrop Grumman Corporation 670 $317,452,963.16
Apptis Inc. 400 $263,178,140.07
Artel Inc. 232 $261,362,109.11
Computer Sciences Corporation 339 $198,826,087.16

Defense Logistics Agency

Company Total actions Total dollars
Agility 24,090 $1,913,213,109.55
Royal Dutch Shell PLC 12 $1,893,210,329.86
The Bahrain Petroleum Company B.S.C. 6 $1,754,451,969.04
BP P.L.C. 28 $1,684,285,999.43
Amerisourcebergen Corporation 64,715 $1,258,838,905.31

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Company Total actions Total dollars
Charles E Collier 14 $8,163,431.67
Integrated Resource Technologies 14 $7,707,247.09
Information Gateways  Inc. 3 $6,598,800.00
Events Unlimited Inc. 53 $4,736,407.84
Culmen International LLC 17 $3,700,905.00

Defense Commissary Agency (DECA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Kraft Foods Inc. 52,672 $462,530,049.60
Tyson Foods Inc. 57,473 $399,900,586.39
The Procter & Gamble Company 6,453 $312,987,601.32
PepsiCo Inc. 22,856 $210,064,462.15
General Mills Inc. 13,757 $207,429,487.40

Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Lockheed Martin Corporation 123 $59,849,620.17
Computer Sciences Corporation 40 $46,039,582.90
Electronic Data Systems Corporation 62 $42,525,030.67
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. 108 $27,565,533.00
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 16 $17,582,793.93

Defense Media Center (DMC)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Innovative Technologies Inc. 27 $17,319,763.74
Taft Broadcasting Company LLC 18 $7,967,929.16
Towne Group Inc. 7 $5,999,071.46
Omnitec Solutions Inc. 22 $4,656,841.63
Film House Inc. 16 $3,499,993.38

Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
SKE Technischer Service GMBH 54 $27,755,917.30
Dell Inc. 46 $22,655,101.06
Pearson PLC 650 $17,574,464.41
Audax Reisen Gesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter Haftung 81 $11,935,032.08
Town of Lincoln 2 $10,192,190.00

Washington Headquarters Services (WHS)

Company Total actions Total dollars
Hensel Phelps Construction Co. 12 $208,627,478.00
General Dynamics Corporation 21 $73,953,096.26
Catapult Technology Ltd. 7 $19,756,695.64
Scitor Corporation 32 $19,057,261.13
Dmjm/Parsons A Joint Venture 10 $16,246,022.72

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS)

Company Total actions Total dollars
The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Milita 56 $17,422,548.16
Onconova Therapeutics Inc. 1 $4,274,446.00
Corbin Company 343 $3,482,840.02
Concurrent Technologies Corporation 4 $1,022,000.00
World Wide Technology Holding Co. Inc. 1 $966,782.78

Missile Defense Agency (MDA)

Company Total actions Total dollars
The Boeing Company 44 $1,663,936,105.00
Lockheed Martin Corporation 262 $1,326,609,630.63
Raytheon Company 209 $978,990,087.97
Northrop Grumman Corporation 669 $681,660,706.67
Computer Sciences Corporation 137 $214,351,162.60

U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)

Company Total actions Total dollars
L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. 3,553 $781,680,577.20
The Boeing Company 82 $114,830,024.25
M A Federal Inc. 157 $105,376,236.89
ITT Corporation 49 $102,623,504.53
Raytheon Company 142 $91,306,439.18

Pentagon demand Stable for bushings, rings, shims & spacers

With the Pentagon preparing for spending cuts, BidLink is looking for opportunities for American companies to prosper.  Declines in spending on new weapons systems means more replacement parts for aging equipment.  Many are common items, which can be made by companies who might be struggling due to softening consumer demand.

If you’re in the business of making bushings, rings, shims or spacers for the defense department, business is good.  Purchasing activity for these items from federal supply class (FSC) 5365 have been stable even through the depths of the great recession.

Looking at spending in this area over the past four years, we see relatively stable purchasing volume.  This is what we often find when analyzing the manufacture of what are commonly known in the military as “spares”.  The dramatic increase from 2006 likely relates to a transfer of buying activity from the old DOD procurement system to BSM (Business System Modernization).  An analysis of projected buying activity for 2011 shows that DOD is planning to purchase approximately $30,000,000 worth of bushings, rings, shims and spacers.

DOD buying activity for rings, bushings, shims & spacers
DOD buying activity for rings, bushings, shims & spacers

In an analysis of the industries top players by sales volume, GE Aviation (99207) leads, but also holds the third place spot (CAGE 07482). Their top contract from 2009 for this supply class was for 127  ring, bearing seals (NSN 5365-00-042-7344) at $1,384.70 each, totaling $175,856 (see contract).

A breakdown of the top 10 defense suppliers in 2009, looking at total sales in dollars.

Top 10 defense suppliers of bushings, rings, shims & spacers (by sales)
Top 10 defense suppliers of bushings, rings, shims & spacers (by sales)

We also looked at the most popular items purchased within this supply class.

Stock Number Contracts Item Name Cage Company
5365-01-246-8281 380 SUPPORT ASSEMBLY 02769 LOCKHEED MARTIN
5365-00-511-3133 272 SPACER,RING 73030 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND
5365-00-310-5808 213 BUSHING,TAPERED 73030 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND
5365-01-144-7377 162 SPACER,SLEEVE 45152 OSHKOSH
5365-01-223-3631 158 SPACER,SLEEVE 78286 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT
5365-01-223-3628 141 SPACER,SLEEVE 78286 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT
5365-01-471-8147 135 RING,BALL JOINT 45152 OSHKOSH
5365-00-550-5070 131 SPACER,RING 73030 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND
5365-01-180-2369 127 PLUG,MACHINE THREAD 78500 MERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE
5365-01-246-9548 122 SHIM 78286 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT

This information was discovered using BidLink.net’s comprehensive database of DLA procurement history for 2009. It also includes analysis from the NSN database and the central contractor registry. For 14 days of free access to BidLink.net, click here.

Demand for Unmanned Aircraft Systems continue to grow in the U.S.

MQ9 Reaper
The MQ9-Reaper Unmanned Aircraft

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) are a hot topic for both the U.S. Military and the FAA. According to the FAA there are some 100 U.S. companies, academic institutions, and government organizations developing over 300 UAS designs. This unmanned aircraft industry is in its infancy; currently the majority of the users of these systems are military. Unmanned aircraft systems are part of the larger group of unmanned systems which include unmanned ground systems, unmanned maritime systems and their related technologies. The Department of Defense is aggressively developing unmanned systems and technologies and has slated plans out till the year 2034.

Unmanned aircraft systems have experienced an explosive growth within the DoD, providing highly capable intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR). While DoD is currently the primary user of these systems interest is growing within federal agencies, state and local governments. Potential uses such as law enforcement, firefighting and commercial real estate photography just to name a few. Sizes of current UAS’s range from only few inches to over 250 feet long, some can remain aloft for 30 hours or more.

Win More Contracts with BidLink
Win More Contracts with BidLink (story continues below)

MQ-9 Reaper – Unmanned Aircraft System

The U.S. Air Force has procurement requests planned for 48 units per year over the next 5 years until 2015. The total budget request for UAS in fiscal year 2011 is $1,079,595,000 dollars. This procurement cost includes all components of the MQ-9 weapon system.

The MQ-9 Reaper is a fully operational UAS consisting of the aircraft, sensors, ground control station, (GCS) satellite link, spare equipment along with operations and maintenance crews for deployed locations.  A typical crew consists of a rated pilot to control the aircraft and command the mission and an enlisted aircrew member to operate sensors and weapons plus a mission coordinator, when required.

MQ9-Reaper_controls
MQ9 Reaper Control Room

The MQ-9 baseline system carries a robust suite of sensors for targeting including infrared sensor, laser-guided munitions, and synthetic aperture radar; color/ monochrome camera, laser designator and a laser illuminator.  Each MQ-9 aircraft system can be disassembled and loaded into a single container, transported in the C-130 Hercules or larger aircraft, for deployment worldwide.

This past May (May 27, 2010) the Army recognized a milestone of 1 million hours of flight for unmanned aerial systems.

Based on the numbers and reports it looks like unmanned aircraft systems are here to stay, providing opportunities to companies both large and small.

* Writers are free to paraphrase or re-publish this article as long as they credit bidlink.net and link back to the original.

Photo credit: MQ-9 Reaper_081103-F-8477M-991|Capt. Sam Allen operates the controls of a battlespace simulator in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Fundamentals Course’s laboratory. Captain Allen is an instructor with the 563rd Flying Training Squadron and the UASFC director at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. (U.S. Air Force photo/Rich McFadden)

Send comments to news@bidlink.net.