KC-46, Tinker Air Force Base and new DLA contracts issued to Boeing

Boeing’s KC-46 aerial refueling tanker conducts receiver compatibility tests with a U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III (U.S. Air Force photo by Christopher Okula)

Background on the KC-46 program

The KC-46 program began as KC-X Tanker modernization program and is intended to replace the US Air Force’s legacy aircraft fleet of KC-135 Stratotankers which have been the primary refueling aircraft for more than 50 years. The requirement was for four (4) developmental aircraft with options for up to 175 production aerial refueling tanker aircraft based on existing commercial aircraft designs.   The US Air Force – Aeronautical Systems Center’s (ASC) KC-X Program Office located in Wright-Patterson AFB OH posted solicitation FA8625-10-R-6600 in February of 2010.  In February of 2011 the Air Force awarded contract FA8625-11-C-6600 to the Boeing Company for $4.4 Billion dollars for Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) only excluding options.

The KC-46 is a tanker aircraft designed for aerial refueling used to support to the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps. It can also be used for cargo and aeromedical evacuations.  The cargo deck is located above the refueling system and can accommodate passengers, patients, and cargo.  The KC-46A will be able to carry up to eighteen (18) 463L cargo pallets which is the standard pallet system used for years. The sustainment strategy for the aircraft includes a 40-year service life.

Other major Government contracts awarded in support of the program

The KC-46 aircraft engines and aircraft frames are to be maintained at Tinker Air Force base, whereas Warner Robins and Ogden will be responsible for things like avionics and landing gear. Tinker decided to design and build a new depot maintenance complex in support of the new KC-46A’s.

The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) working with the Air Force on the project released an award in November of 2013, contract number W912BV-12-D-0006 for an amount of $3,426,910.00 for design of the facility. The architecture firm who was awarded the defense contract was Burns & Mcdonnell, Inc. and the award was made against an IDV the company was awarded back in 2012 out of the USACE Tulsa Oklahoma office.

In August of 2015 solicitation W912BV-15-R-0088 was posted by the USACE click this fedbizopps link for the solicitation. In May of 2016 the contract W912BV-16-C-0029 was awarded to Contrack Watts, Inc a for construction of the KC-46A depot maintenance complex support infrastructure to be located at Tinker Air Force Base, OK. The complex is forecasted start operating sometime in 2019.

Last week DLA Aviation announced a Performance Based Logistics (PBL) program with Boeing for support of the new tanker, more about this in an upcoming article.

BidLink is a leading provider of industry marketing data relating to DoD procurement for the past 18 years.

Additional development costs of the KC-46A Tanker for US Air Force may cost Boeing $1 Billion Dollars

Boeing’s KC-46 aerial refueling tanker conducts receiver compatibility tests with a U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III  (courtesy – U.S. Air Force photo by Christopher Okula)

The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) just released their 7th report on the contract with Boeing for KC-46 Tanker Modernization.  This program will eventually replace approximately one-third of the US Air Force’s legacy aircraft fleet of refueling tankers.  The current fleet is comprised mostly of KC-135 Stratotankers, this new program plans to eventually provide a total of 179 new KC-46 tanker aircraft otherwise known as the KC-46A Pegasus to the Air Force.

This GAO study pointed out a few risks and challenges Boeing currently faces. Things such as a critical deficiency relating to the aerial refueling boom, completing flight tests at a quicker pace, and updating test aircraft to the correct configuration as well as a few other challenges. “Because of the terms of the contract, Boeing, not the government, is responsible for nearly $1 Billion in additional development costs already incurred.”

GAO found that the total acquisition cost estimate was stable over the past year at $44.4 billion and actually decreased about $7.3 billion, due in part to stable requirements. The delivery date of the first 18 fully capable KC-46 aircraft was changed to October 2018.  However risk assessments well as GAO’s analysis projects believe deliveries could slip to May 2019.

Tinker Air Force base where the KC-46A program office was established has already designed and is currently building a new depot maintenance complex in support of the new KC-46A’s. The US Army Corps of Engineers is the contracting agency for the building. DLA Aviation has also been issuing defense contracts in support of this program.

Read more about DLA KC-46 DOD contracts being awarded to Boeing.

BidLink is a leading providing of industry marketing data relating to DoD procurement for the past 18 years.

DoD contracts for wire rope assemblies

Wire rope assemblies are used by DoD in various ways such as helicopter hoists or vehicle mounted winches. The simple assemblies usually consist of a length of wire rope with a hook or loop at either end.

A quick look at the past DoD contracts and current government solicitations shows several million dollars of activity with many repeat purchases. Companies, specifically manufacturers of wire rope assemblies have many opportunities in this sector. Some are standard simple type items and some are classified as critical safety items. Either way in many cases there is little or no competition for some of these items.

Wire rope manufacturers or wire rope assembly companies should take a look at the current business opportunities and possibly win some government contracts.

BidLink is a leading providing of industry marketing data relating to DoD procurement for the past 18 years.

Department of Defense seeking new manufacturers of communication headsets

In the past 7 days we’ve seen a surge of government solicitations issued for aviation headsets or communication headsets all coming from the DLA Land and Maritime, Active devices division. In fact over 3,200 headsets have been requested, with an average cost of over $400.00 each could mean close to 1.3 Million dollars of sales to the contract awardees who win them.

Many situations can cause an increase in number of solicitations you see such as the demand of a product has increased, a vendor has contract delivery issues, or a sole source item is no longer available. Products designated as “sole source” (one supplier) can be problematic especially when there is only one manufacturer. Savvy government contractors typically seek out sole source opportunities as they provide competition to government buyers and possibly better products for the end user. Many small businesses and start-up companies increase their sales by searching for sole source government contracting opportunities.

Between May 3rd and May 10th 2018 DLA posted nine (9) solicitations requesting over 3,200 headsets from 4 different manufacturers. These products are listed as “Commercial off-the-shelf items” and that any alternate offerors provide data packages for evaluation. So as it looks the government is actively searching for new manufacturers of headsets. The majority of the requested headsets are currently manufactured by the David Clark Company.

The top 3 headset manufacturers selling to the US Military are Roanwell headsets (CAGE code 82872), Plantronics headsets, (CAGE 22447), and David Clark headsets (CAGE 71483).

Procurement history data shows that theses headsets used by the Defense Department (DoD) are purchased on a regular basis and that many of them are sole source. These Government solicitations posted the requests under the title “Headset – Microphone” or “Headset, Electrical” as that’s the name of the NSNs associated to the items. Most of the NSNs for headsets are listed as throw away items, when they fail they’re not repaired and new ones are purchased. Noise canceling headsets, pilot headsets or general communication headsets are used everywhere from helicopters to aircraft by everyone.

These solicitations are currently open for bid and can be found at www.bidlink.net or directly on the government website which they were posted on.

Reverse engineering and source approval are ways to increase your government sales. Successful government contractors look at the word sole source as an opportunity.

BidLink is an industry leader in providing government solicitations and procurement data which has been used by DoD and Commercial industries for the past 18 years.

Comments? Contact Jim at jimnews@bidlink.net

www.bidlink.net – 866-226-4488

U.S. Air Force intends on awarding a contract for TH-1H helicopter fleet maintenance

Air Force ROTC cadets from the University of Southern Mississippi ride in a TH-1H helicopter as part of Pathways to Blue April 7, 2018, on Keesler Air Force Base (U.S. Air Force photo by Andre Askew)

The Vietnam-era UH-1H helicopters commonly known as the Huey were modified into a new configuration the TH-1H, back in December 2004 to be used as a new training helicopter for student pilots. Today the U.S. Air Force is looking for a company to provide helicopter maintenance for the TH-1H fleet over the next 5 years.

The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) – Special Operations Forces/Personnel Recovery Division at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia issued a sources sought solicitation FA8552-18-R-0004 for Depot Level Maintenance of this fleet. This division provides acquisition and sustainment for all helicopters in addition to depot maintenance, modification, repair, engineering services, and contracting support for all fielded systems.

This Depot Level Maintenance (DLM) Government contract will require extensive knowledge on the Bell helicopter platforms. It will also require purchasing of spare parts, NSNs and finding manufacturers for obsolete parts for the program.

BidLink is an industry leader in providing government procurement data which has been used by DoD and Commercial industries.

Comments? Contact Jim at jimnews@bidlink.net

www.bidlink.net – 866-226-4488

U.S. Air Force buys spares for B1-B bomber aircraft

A B-1B Lancer assigned to the 28th Bomb Squadron, Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, maneuvers over New Mexico during a training mission on Feb. 24, 2010. Dyess will celebrate the 25th anniversary of the first B-1B bomber arriving at the base with the Dyess Big Country Airfest and Open House on May 1, 2010.
(U.S. Air Force photo/ Master Sgt. Kevin J. Gruenwald) released

The Department of Defense in the support of its many legacy systems requires a constant supply of spare parts. Items can be as simple as basic hardware such as nuts and bolts, electric generators or more complicated systems such as automated test equipment used in maintenance of an aircraft. Successful companies doing business with the Department of Defense (DoD) do more than simply search for bids relating to items they currently produce. They are constantly researching to see where they can expand their business. One simple way of doing this is to analyze an open solicitation of interest.

Below are some common questions and thought processes that result when reviewing a solicitation.

First we look at what is the solicitation asking for?

Government solicitation number SPRWA1-18-R-0029 is requesting a quantity of 10 (ten) Signal Generators NSN 6625-01-584-5846 manufactured by Anritsu CAGE code 1CPM8. These signal generators are used with the Radar/Electronic Warfare test stations in supporting the B1-B bomber aircraft at a depot repair location. It also notes that the item is sole source.

A few questions that come to mind

  • Sole source – some people look at this as opportunity, can I provide a better product, less cost.
  • The equipment is part of a test station, what other divisions use this kind of test station.
  • Who is the manufacture of this test station, can I sell to them.

Who’s buying the item and what are their buying habits?

The specific contracting location is the DLA Aviation, DLR Procurement operations – Aviation wing.  This division of DLA is located at Robins Air Force base Georgia. They purchase Depot Level Repairables (DLRs) which are items repair depots use in maintenance, repair and overhaul operations.

  • 1000’s of contracting offices exist within the U.S. Federal government what other offices perform the same function as this one, can I sell to them?
  • The better your knowledge of contracting locations buying habits the more successful you’ll be in government contracting; more about this in upcoming articles.

The solicitation says “Sole Source” what do I do now?

In many cases a solicitation will say “the Government intends to solicit and negotiate with only one source”, however they may also say “interested persons may identify to the contracting officer their interest and capability to satisfy the Government’s requirement with a commercial item” – This may be your opportunity to offer an equivalent item and possibly win a bid. The Government in most cases does not want only one source. If that one source goes out of business problems can arise.

Analyze past sales based on National Stock Numbers (NSNs) and part numbers.

This Solicitation listed an RFQ for 10 NSNs 6625-01-584-5846. In this case this NSN represents several part numbers that make up this NSN. An NSN is simply a 13 digit number that represents an item of supply. The NSN can represent something as simple as a ½ inch nickel-copper plated bolt or a complete system or specific configuration containing multiple items as it is with this NSN.

This NSN 6625-01-584-5846 shows a part number of MG3692-IATE. This part number actually represents a configuration of other items: MG3692C – Synthesizer, MG3690C/1A – Rack Mount, MG3690C/2A – Attenuator… according to the solicitation.

Further research on the first part number MG3692C shows a catalog price of $19,467.68 each, with the description of Signal Generator; 2-20 GHZ.

So the next time you look at a solicitation look beyond “Can I supply this item” and try doing a little research to find some new business opportunities.

In the process of helping out our clients over the past 18 years generate new government sales we’ve demonstrated various ways to search for government bids.

BidLink is an industry leader in providing government procurement data which has been used by DoD and Commercial industries.

Comments? Contact Jim at jimnews@bidlink.net

SpaceX launched a Tesla Roadster into space this week

On Tuesday February 6, 2018 Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) launched their Falcon Heavy rocket into space with a Tesla Roadster as their payload with “Starman” as the driver of the car.

“Silly fun things are important” Elon Musk said during a press conference following this historic launch. “Normally for a new rocket they’d launch like a block of concrete or something like that and that’s so boring, and I think that just the imagery of it is something that’s going to get people excited around the world”.

SpaceX began their business in March of 2002 and a short time later received their Government CAGE code 3BVL8 in September of 2002. Companies wishing to do business with the U.S. Federal Government, DoD or any of its agencies are required to get a CAGE code.

On September 26, 2003 SpaceX was awarded their first government contract for Basic space flight research with the Naval Research Laboratory. The contract number was N00173-03-C6021 for a total $500,000.

In 2014 SpaceX filed a Complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging, that the United States Air Force has entered into an unlawful contract with United Launch Systems, a joint venture between The Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, to procure rocket launch vehicles on a sole source basis, pursuant to the Air Force’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program.

The above complaint probably occurred due to research as it related to past U.S. Government contracts, in this case U.S. Air Force contracts. Any company selling to the DoD, or U.S. Federal Government will benefit from this kind of research and is something that successful Government contractors do on a continuous basis. Data and research helps show the path to success answering questions such as who are my competitors? What price did they charge?

SpaceX is now one of the contractors in the Air Force EELV Program. On April 27, 2016 the US Air Force, Space Missile Systems Center division in El Segundo Calif. awarded SpaceX a contract for EELV Phase 1A GPS III Launch Services for an amount of $82,700,000.00, the contract number was FA8811-16-C0001.

Data gathered from multiple U.S. Government sources is one way to see the best picture. We also found some FAA data relating to launch vehicles for commercial uses showing two of Tesla’s competitors:

All three companies provide orbital vehicles for commercial purposes; they are ULA, LMCLS and SpaceX. Each operates at the same launch site at CCAFS VAFB. The rocket, payload and commercial estimated price per launch are as follows:

Atlas V – Mass to GTO (kg) 3,460 $110M
Delta IV Mass to GTO (kg) 3,060 $164M
Falcon 9 Mass to GTO (kg) 4,850 $61.2M

As you can see there is a drastic difference between the pricing so when competing against an open Government solicitation knowing this information can be valuable.

If your company large or small wishes contract with the U.S. Federal Government, the more data you review the better off you will be.

The majority of this articles content came from data contained within the BidLink database. BidLink is an industry leader in providing government procurement data which has been used by DoD and Commercial industries for the past 18 years.

P.S. Elon one suggestion, add some solar electric charging stations in space for “Starman” to recharge at. – Jim

Comments? Contact Jim at
jimnews@bidlink.net

Do you know who your competitors are?

The military and commercial world spends countless hours seeking out competitors. Whether it’s looking for a lower price/alternative manufacturer, an obsolete part no longer available, or if you’re a parts supplier / parts manufacturer your needs may be different. We get questions like: How many does the US Military buy and for how much? Is the military buying my competitors product?

Someone producing or selling an item with similar salient characteristics can be defined as a competitor. Searching for a competitor may result in finding a better product/price and perhaps other benefits such as a newer version – longer lifetime or lower failure rate. So the deeper you look, trolling through more data the better your answer will be.

If your research begins with Federal government procurement websites such as FBO or USA Spending that’s a good start but not nearly complete. Countless federal acquisition systems exist and should also be reviewed for a more accurate answer. This article quickly touches the kind of data found in using acquisition methods such as GSA Schedules and Blanket Purchase Agreement or BPAs.

Government sales and detail purchase data may or may not be reported to the various public government websites so FOIA requests with all the government purchasing departments may be necessary to find your answers.

Here is one example showing a National Stock Number (NSN) item purchased by DoD and various government departments over the past 18 years. The NSN in question was 3540-00-344-8642 it’s an item used in shipping departments to carry and dispense steel strapping coil used for securing wood crates and similar items, it’s a simple hand truck. Several questions were answered.

Using the BidLink, we were able to quickly determine that this NSN 3540-00-344-8642 item name “Hand Truck, Strapping Coil” has been purchased every year with varying quantities to various government departments supplied by only a handful of companies. The most recent sales have been through GSA schedule and BPA contracts. Specifically GS-07F-DA222 and GS-02F-0125U found under GSA Schedule categories 51 V Hardware Superstore and 81 I B Shipping, Packaging and packing supplies. Most recent prices ranged from $188 to $225 each.

The two sellers of this NSN currently provide product from different manufacturers specifically Universal and USP.

Caprice electronics and Complete packaging & shipping supplies are the two most recent suppliers selling the majority of this item.

If you were to guess which company sells more of this NSN, a Hand truck an item used in the shipping department – Well if you guessed “Complete packaging & shipping supplies” you would have been wrong it’s Caprice Electronics and the data shows that.  So when trying to find competitors look at much data as you can.

BidLink’s Market Research tool and exclusive data has been used by DoD and Commercial industries for the past 18 years. – Jim

Comments? Contact Jim at jimnews@bidlink.net

www.bidlink.net – 866-226-4488

Government trade shows could be better

Defense Industry Trade Show
Defense Industry Trade Show

Government sponsored trade shows are B2G events that bring together buyers and sellers.  On the surface, it sounds like a great idea to increase competition for Government business. However, many companies are finding that the leads generated from these shows do not turn into business.

B2G shows are often packed with buyers, who process requisitions from managers and end users.  Their job is to solicit items and services, ensure competition where possible, and make sure the procurement adheres to the FAR.  Buyers can invite new companies into a procurement, but they do not decide what products and services are needed by the Government.

SPY PHONE BOX

At a recent trade show, the booth next to us at BidLink was a company selling a secret spy-phone signal blocking box, for top secret conference rooms.  It was basically a cone-of-silence for cell phones, with radio signal blocking, sound deadening and speakers that generate white noise.  Secret agents could put their phones in the box, close it, and have private conversation without the prying ears of spies. People in secret meetings can honestly say, “Honey, the phone never rang. I swear”.  It was a great idea, that will never gain traction at the typical B2G show.  This is because buyers, the most common attendees at B2G shows are not the folks who would make a decision that the Government needs a few secret spy-phone blocking boxes.  Program managers and other higher-ups have this authority, but it’s simply not the buyer’s job to decide what the Government needs.

A few booths down, there was a company selling industrial supplies. He had a catalog of over 10,000 items; everything from generators, to wash buckets, to paint, to industrial toilet paper.  B2G Shows are perfect for this type of company.  Drive around any military base and you will see hosing units, stores offices, and lots of people.  These people need every day things, and the Government buys lots of them.  A vendor selling commonly purchased items could forge a new relationship with many buyers at a B2G show.  Especially if they are 8a or small business.  Buyers love to bolster their set asides.

BETTER NETWORKING

We see lots of companies selling IT solutions at these shows.  They sell innovative solutions to Government problems, including staffing, supply chain, and even BidLink, who provides a tool for sourcing, pricing, and finding out almost anything about an NSN.  These services do not have a clearly defined market in the Military, but they provide efficiency that could save the Government money and time.

If you are trying to introduce something new to the Government, you may find it difficult to get any traction from a Government trade show.  This is because most of the attendees at these shows are either buyers, who only buy items that are requisitioned, or end users with no buying authority. We have met with very few program managers at these shows.  Program managers have the authority to decide if a new product or service could be of use to their group.

The idea of getting business and Government together make sense. Companies have difficulty reaching the right contacts in Government, so hosting meetups is a great idea. The disconnect is that sometimes these shows are filled with people who alone, cannot make the decision to buy your new product or service.

What might improve these trade shows would be for program managers as well as several of their personnel to attend the show together.  Often the program manager might not directly use the product or service, but has the authority to decide if it should be purchased. Program managers roaming a trade show with a couple of end users, who can evaluate the service would provide a powerful combination.  Combining the need to buy (end user) with the purchasing authority (program manager) allows companies with new ideas for the Government to showcase their wares to folks who may actually buy what they offer.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide. This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details. This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry. BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid search and notification services, competition analysis as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

For the news and tools to compete in the defense industry, go to www.bidlink.net.

By Tom Gerbe,  Defense Industry Analyst.

Defense Contracting – Cables without Competition

 

U.S. Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Michael Rack; Dili, Timor-Leste, June 18, 2011. Photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Christopher Farrington

By Tom Gerbe – Defense Industry Analyst – BidLink.net

The U.S. Defense Department has over 57,000 open solicitations that have gone unanswered.  Among these items are cable assemblies that could be produced by informed manufacturers.  As a data analyst for BidLink.net I have been combing through opportunities for readers of “Wire and Cable Technology” and have located a number of big ticket items for which the Government cannot find suppliers.

Many defense contractors aggressively compete for the lowest price in order to win bids, fighting against anywhere from two to twenty companies on each solicitation.  There is an easier way — find bids for which there is no competition. One way to accomplish this is to find unanswered bids.  In some cases current suppliers no longer manufacture a part for which there is still a need.  In the examples below, there are several items which were designated as “small business” meaning that the defense department is required to purchase the part from a company under a certain size.  A large company may have supplied the item in the past, but now it must go to a small business. This can spell opportunity for contractors who are paying attention. 

Below are a list of solicitations from the Defense Department that are past the closing date but remain unanswered. Expired bids can be researched using the Quick Search at BidLink.net.

Solicitation # Item name Quantity Stock Number (NSN) Price Range (ea)
SPE4A013T0918 Cable Assembly 24 5995015219577 $2,888 – $4,631
SPE4A512T4824 Cable Assembly 7 5995015219577 $541 – $881
SPE4A512T5555 Cable, Adapter 2 5995013310791 $1,080 – $2,657
SPE4A013T0599 Cable Assembly 1 5995013622192 $3,292 – $16,336
SPE4A513Q2480 Cable Assembly 7 5995014551297 $12,566 – $16,332
SPE4A513T8337 Cable Assembly 19 5995015516163 $1,124 – $1,172

The prices above span a wide range, likely due to the lack of competition for these items.  If the part is a critical item and there is only one company that can supply it, the Government will pay any reasonable price to obtain the part.  This is reflected in the procurement history for the items above.

When a bid goes unanswered, it stays open even after the closing date.  Over time, thousands of these unanswered bids remain in the system waiting for someone to respond with a quote.  In some cases aircraft can remain grounded and equipment can go unused because the Government cannot find a qualified supplier.  If you have not made an item for the Government before you may have to submit a Source Approval Request (SAR) to the agency in order to receive approval to sell the part to the Government.

Due to the sequester, the defense budget is shrinking causing companies to find new ways to compete.  Locating solicitations for which there is no current supplier become a treasure trove for companies that know how to locate this business.

BidLink.net is a provider of defense industry information for contractors worldwide. This data includes millions of defense contracts, procurement history, part numbers and vendor details. This unique combination of resources allows BidLink to monitor and extract important information for the defense contracting industry. BidLink.net, based in Washington, D.C., provides bid search and notification services, competition analysis as well as part number (NSN) lookup to many military activities and thousands of private companies around the world.

For the news and tools to compete in the defense industry, go to www.bidlink.net.